Top of the News

Chosen and ranked by Crosscut editors. Click date for previous days.

Mouse over headline for description.

more top of the news

Advertisement

Advertisement

The Crosscut Blog »

Mar 27, 2008 12:00 PM | last updated Mar 27, 2008 11:34 AM
Advertisement
Advertisement

Top-two primary boosts chances for instant run-off voting

By Benjamin Lukoff

Washington's nominating process for partisan political office has a long, tortuous history — and it just got a little longer. Last week's Supreme Court decision upholding Initiative 872, which established a "top-two" or "Louisiana-style" primary to replace the blanket primary declared unconstitutional in 2003, gives the Evergreen state its third distinct system in the space of five years.

David Brewster points out that one benefit of this method, in which the top two vote-getters advance to the general election — regardless of party affiliation — may be less-secure seats for incumbents, and a move toward the political center. But challengers and their fans aren't the only ones celebrating. There's now some buzz in the instant-runoff voting (IRV) community about this being an opportunity to extend their success beyond Pierce County, which will be holding the first IRV race in the state this November.

In IRV, voters rank candidates in order of preference and no separate primary is required. Proponents say that this ensures winners have the support of a majority, not merely a plurality, and that it would eliminate the phenomena of spoilers, wasted votes, and having to choose the "lesser of two evils." Rob Richie, executive director of FairVote, thinks there is a "powerful case" to be made that IRV "in one high-turnout November election is better than...a relatively low-turnout summer election followed by a higher-turnout choice among two candidates who might not even be particularly representative of the views of the district/state's voters."

It remains to be seen, however, whether Washington voters are ready to ditch primaries altogether. Given that the beloved blanket primary isn't coming back, will "top two" satisfy their desire to zigzag across the aisle? Or could the Democrats, Republicans, and Libertarians — who banded together to sink the blanket primary and unsuccessfully challenge the new system — decide that at least under IRV their candidates are certain to appear on the November ballot? After all, "top two" will likely result in Republicans being absent from the fall ballot in Seattle, Democrats likewise in Wenatchee, and Libertarians, Greens, and the rest of them nowhere at all.

  • Benjamin Lukoff is a Seattle freelance writer and former reviewer for Amazon.com.
Comments
Free speech
Report a violationPosted by: animalal on Mar 28, 2008 8:47 PM
Not having read the 7-2 case, nor the initiative that overturned the blanket primary, I suppose the individual free speech right to vote supercedes the collective assembly right of free speech previously exercised by the political parties. Too bad the politicos and judges cannot be so precise with brevity.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign up for Crosscut's free weekday newsletter e-mail.
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Crosscut »
Crosscut Seattle is an online newspaper for the Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and British Columbia. It's a guide to local and regional news, a place to report and discuss news, and a platform for new tools to convey news.

• More about Crosscut

Contact Crosscut

Tools

Sign up for Crosscut's daily newsletter
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.
Advertisement