Top of the News

Chosen and ranked by Crosscut editors. Click date for previous days.

Mouse over headline for description.

more top of the news

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


Flip Side »

Mar 9, 2008 10:00 PM | last updated Mar 9, 2008 10:49 PM
Daylight saving clock.
Advertisement
Advertisement

If it's 3 a.m. when the Red Phone rings, what time is it really?

There's so much the federal government could be doing to make life easier, namely: Stop taking an hour away from us every spring and start moving blocks of time to more civilized and useful hours of the day.

By Steve Clifford

Sunday was "Spring ahead for Daylight Saving" day.

Every spring the government borrows an hour from each of us. With luck, we will get repaid in the fall.

The government refuses to acknowledge its debt. If Sarbanes Oxley applied to governments, they would have to disclose:

In addition to the hundreds of billions we owe to the Chinese, the Saudis, the Luxembourgeoise, etc., we also owe 301,139,947 hours to various citizens and residents. This is not a trivial debt since many of them are lawyers billing $425 an hour.

So as of Sunday, March 9, the government owes us more than 303 million hours. While we hope to be paid back, we may discover there is no "Fall Backwards" in 2008 because hundreds of millions of hours were quietly earmarked for ADD counseling in Alaska Water District No. 15 in the Homeland Security appropriations bill.

Meanwhile, what does the government do with all the hours they borrowed? Where do they store them? Who is accountable?

Why don't they pay us back with interest? Three minutes of interest for an hour may not seem like much, but compounded over time, it would become significant.

Based on the shameful and discredited scare tactic that we are running out of daylight and somehow need to save more, the government forces us to loan them an hour and change our clock twice a year for no discernable benefit.

If the government wants to rearrange time, they should start getting rid of 3 a.m. "In the real dark night of the soul it is always three o'clock in the morning," wrote F. Scott Fitzgerald. Why can't the government move 3 a.m. to 1 p.m. and give everyone an extra hour for lunch?

February is a month with little to recommend it. Why doesn't the government place February between May and June, shortening winter and lengthening spring?

Why is no one addressing these issues? Where is the candidate who will promise, "When the Red Phone in the White House rings, it won't be 3 a.m. because I will have moved 3 a.m. to lunchtime"?

  • Steve Clifford writes humor for Crosscut. In his unhumorous life, he was CEO of King Broadcasting and once played a role in saving New York City from bankruptcy.
Comments
This is insanity!
Report a violationPosted by: dbreneman on Mar 10, 2008 10:39 AM
Three AM is one of the coolest hours of the day. If you eliminate it in favor of another hour of daylight, the effect on Global Warming will be incalculable.
Repeal the Bush Time Cuts
Report a violationPosted by: dpc456 on Mar 13, 2008 12:13 PM
The loss of this important hour obviously harms working women and minorities the most. I say let's take two or three hours away from people making more than $250,000 per year, and redistribute the time to the rest of us. They can afford it!
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign up for Crosscut's free weekday newsletter e-mail.
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Crosscut »
Crosscut Seattle is an online newspaper for the Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and British Columbia. It's a guide to local and regional news, a place to report and discuss news, and a platform for new tools to convey news.

• More about Crosscut

Contact Crosscut

Tools

Sign up for Crosscut's daily newsletter
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement