About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
2008 Election » Alaska »A state 'awash in money' from an extraction economy: It's different being governor of Alaska
Wasilla, Alaska, got $26.9 million in earmarks while Sarah Palin was mayor
Sarah Palin vs. the librarian: Facts are hard to come by
2008 Election »Mayor Palin had a rough record at Wasilla City Hall
Alaska »Under Mayor Palin, Wasilla went the strip-mall route
2008 Election »Sarah Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant and will marry the father
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
The high price of Sarah Palin's candidacy
Sarah Palin: the liberal voter's worst nightmare
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
(91 comments)
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
(27 comments)
Sarah Palin: the liberal voter's worst nightmare
(24 comments)
The high price of Sarah Palin's candidacy
(19 comments)
The case for Sarah Palin
(17 comments)
A classic evisceration speech by the running mate
(11 comments)
Extreme Seattle
(10 comments)
Why Palin, why now
(9 comments)
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
(8 comments)
No post-convention bounce for the Democrats
(7 comments)
What is the None Zone? It's a term coined by religious researchers who reported in 2004 that the Pacific Northwest — Washington, Oregon and Alaska — is the only part of the U.S. where a majority of people (more than 60 percent) check "none of the above" when asked their religious affiliation. That compares with 40 percent nationally. And nearly one-third say they are purely secular "humanists" or have no religion at all. That compares with 19 percent nationally and a mere 11 percent in the South.
In short, the None Zone is the opposite of the Bible Belt.
Seattle has gained a reputation as a particularly godless corner of the None Zone. For a time last summer, the most-watched video on the Seattle Channel Web site was a Town Hall lecture by Christopher Hitchens about his provocatively titled book God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything.
During the City Council races last fall, candidate Tim Burgess was put on the defensive for being a Christian "values" voter. In Seattle, that made him suspect despite his liberal, green, and pro-gay politics. And in November, Seattle Post-Intelligencer columnist D. Parvaz was excoriated by right-wing Web sites and the Fox TV crowd for seeming to condone "church burning" in a piece about a self-proclaimed performance artist who was alleged to have contemplated torching a church for the sake of "art." One Northwest Republican blogger concluded that Parvaz "obviously hates Christians." Though a complete misreading of what Parvaz said, it fit the image that liberal Seattle's idea of religious tolerance is to tolerate people who would burn churches.
Seattle and the Northwest are not completely irreligious. There are plenty of Catholics and Protestants, and there's a yeasty fermentation in the number of evangelical entrepreneurs, New Age groups, neo-pagans, and other nonmainstream religious groups that call the area home. The West has always been ripe for religious and utopian experiments. And many Nones still profess a belief in God. They may not sit in a pew on Sunday, but most aren't atheists. They may simply be skeptics of organized religion.
Perhaps the largest contingent of Nones are nature worshippers. In an article on specific Northwest religious trends, called "Secular But Spiritual," Mark Shibley of Southern Oregon University wrote that "nothing is more central to Northwest nature religion than the idea of wilderness." Preserving wilderness, therefore, is a sacred act. As a result, he says, "Much contemporary environmentalism in the Northwest is a religious system." You get a sense of that zeal in the growing movement led by Al Gore, Greg Nickels, and others to save the world from the apocalypse of global warming.
The source of Seattle values would be a private matter if it wasn't for the city's widespread cultural and technological influence; it matters to people everywhere if Microsoft supports gay rights or whether Starbucks shows a mermaid's bare breasts on its logo (it once did, but no longer).
Few expect perfect moral behavior from corporate players — heaven help you if you raised your child to be like Boeing, a company that has a history of bullying and cheating to get what it wants. But knowing the source of a company's values can offer insights into its behavior. Newspaper and magazine columnist (and founder of Microsoft's Slate magazine) Michael Kinsley says that Ayn Rand is popular at Microsoft. She was an atheist who originated the philosophy of Objectivism and touted the virtues of selfishness and dog-eat-dog competition. No wonder she's the darling of Redmond's chosen.
Another reason values matter: Seattle is a biotech research center, and we stand at the threshold of fundamentally changing the world with cloning, gene manipulation, nanotechnology, the wiring of human brains, the impact of new drugs, and genetic treatments. We also are home to global organizations that will spread these techniques and technologies to the world. What do these people who carry our future in their hands ask themselves when they go into work each day? "What would Jesus do?" "What would the Dalai Lama do?" "What would Ayn Rand do?" "What would Gaia do?" "What would Darwin do?"
Here in the None Zone, there is no single answer, but the answers are still important.
I don't mean to imply any such thing, and I say that as an unchurched heathen "None." I am saying that values do matter and so does the source. Being in the "None" zone doesn't mean we don't have values and I think it's important to talk about them, whatever god, tree, author or hairy thunderer one worships.
I do believe there is a heaven and a hell and my acceptance of this sacrifice is what saves me from hell, that God himself redeemed me by offering the choice to accept Him. And as a result, my faith produces an outpouring of good works as well as a desire to live in ways that are congruous with my choice to follow Him.
Please provide data in support of your allegation. If you accuse, it's only far that you prove.
While Mencken had a sharp wit, I doubt whether it's of much use to him today. I wouldn't want to trade eternal places with him for all the tea in China.
What makes right right and wrong wrong? Where do values of good and evil come from? For most, even those who deny it, they come from God.
Thank you for providing an additional example of in-the-name-of-tolerance intolerance. While you have an absolute right to your opinion, I submit that yours is the dark ages-like angry tone.
When some religious beliefs crossed into law the result was The Civil Rights Act of 1964. Care to repeal it?
"Anytime the source of law is construed to be 'divine', freedom dies." Completely untrue. Even Jefferson acknowledged that, "All men...are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."
Report a violationPosted by: hendricks on Jan 12, 2008 7:22 AM