Top of the News

Chosen and ranked by Crosscut editors. Click date for previous days.

Mouse over headline for description.

more top of the news

Advertisement

Advertisement


Most Commented

Crosscut articles of the past 10 days with the most reader comments.

Vision 2040 for Pugetopolis
(32 comments)

The pet peeve
(21 comments)

In Seattle, let the people 'chill'
(16 comments)

Seattle's money madness
(16 comments)

All the rage
(13 comments)

Our balls on ice
(12 comments)

Is Big Nanny running your town?
(10 comments)

A bicoastal newspaper crisis
(10 comments)

Time for a bus-fare reality check
(9 comments)

Walkability is nice, but it's not making us skinny
(8 comments)

Mossback »

May 12, 2008 5:00 AM | last updated May 13, 2008 10:08 PM
Crosscut Focus: People vs. Puget Sound.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Puget Sound on Prozac

Pretty as it is, our signature waterway is a chemical dump for everything from oil to sewage — and even anti-depressants. You may be surprised (and disgusted) by what turns up there.

By Knute Berger

We’re on the brink of summer, Seattle’s biggest outdoor season. More likely than not, one day in the next few months you’ll find yourself gazing out at Puget Sound. The waters will be sparkling, the rugged Olympics or Cascades will make a spectacular backdrop and overhead — for a couple of days in August — might be, as Perry Como sang, “the bluest skies you’ve ever seen....”

If you’re lucky, you’ll be out there on a boat, perhaps on one of the innumerable pleasure craft or on a ferry crossing Elliott Bay. You’ll point out the visible wonders to your fellow shipmates, and your out-of-town guests will be in awe. But the reality is, you might as well be the little yachtsman in the old bathroom cleanser commercials: The Man from Ty-D-Bol. Indeed, he probably sailed on cleaner waters in a freshly scrubbed toilet.

The fact is, Puget Sound is a toxic dump and a sewer.

Sure, we’ve heard that Puget Sound needs to be cleaned up. But even knowing the Sound’s long history of industry around its edges — and that sometimes septic tanks leak into its waters — it looks so damn good. How can anything be wrong? Puget Sound’s pollution isn’t the kind that sets waters on fire, as happened to the old Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, once upon a time. It’s a quiet, almost invisible disaster.

The Sound is an arm of the sea, and it’s deep. That’s what attracted so many settlers, adventurers and city builders: good ports and protected waters. In the last 150 years, humans have swarmed into the Puget Sound Basin, some 4 million of us. The Sound is now suffering, but its pain is masked by its pristine surface. The deep waters hide much of the problem: In sediments and throughout the food chain, our presence is being felt.

Take this shocking figure, reported in The Olympian earlier this year. The number-one source of pollution in the Sound isn’t industry, it’s us. Runoff from our roads, sidewalks, driveways, etc. is the biggest single source of pollutants, according to the state Department of Ecology. Every year, 22,580 metric tons of oil and petroleum flow in just from this source. To put that in perspective, that’s roughly the equivalent of an Exxon Valdez–size oil spill every other year. This in a body of water from which oil tankers are banned. Can you imagine the outrage if we’d had 10 Exxon Valdez spills in the last 20 years?

Much of the pollution flowing into the sea is more personal. The Sound’s Chinook salmon have high levels of flame retardants, the kind of chemicals used to make your upholstery and pajamas fire resistant. Every drug we put into our bodies finds its way into the water, mostly through the sewer system (what goes in, comes out, eventually, and not everything is “treated” at your local sewage treatment plant). What finds its way into the water eventually gets into the creatures that live there. On the East Coast, a study showed that chemicals from the anti-depressant Prozac were altering the reproductive cycles of mussels.

And our lifestyle is a factor, too. In California, some sea otters have been infected with parasites that can only have come from pet cats, presumably when their poop is flushed down the toilet or washed away by rain. Last year, researchers detected elevated levels of vanilla extract and cinnamon in Puget Sound right around Thanksgiving, evidence that traces of our seasonal diet, cookies and all, are reflected in our waste and, therefore, in our waters. The onslaught of Christmas fruitcake could have consequences!

Our impact on the environment is so extensive that we really have to begin rethinking the whole concept of “wilderness.” All that beauty we look at from our decks or high-rise offices is not what it appears to be. A six-year study by the Environmental Protection Agency’s National Health and Environmental Effects Laboratory found that even the most remote parts of our national parks are polluted. It found high levels of mercury in fish in lakes of the Olympics and Mount Rainier.

Citizens have been trying to mobilize to “save” Puget Sound for decades. The government is working on the problem with task forces and studies. But a sense of urgency is still lacking. One recent poll asked central Puget Sound–area residents what the top priority for state government was. Only 2 percent named cleaning up Puget Sound.

It’s hard to take a crisis seriously when it looks so pretty.

  • Knute Berger is Mossback, Crosscut's chief Northwest native. He also writes the monthly Gray Matters column for Seattle magazine and is a weekly Friday guest on Weekday on KUOW-FM (94.9). You can e-mail him at mossback@crosscut.com.
Comments
NOTHING TO BE DONE
Report a violationPosted by: kieth on May 12, 2008 11:58 AM
The Olympian, if correct, describes an insoluble problem. Our economy (I predict we will not give it ups) depends on the culprits; cars, trucks, roads.

But what about Rotterdam, Shanghai, Tokyo? are they all just as bad? Does the Hudson River keep the Jersey ports relatively clean? I doubt it. So what do these other guys do? just live with it, die with it?
Thank you...
Report a violationPosted by: dbreneman on May 12, 2008 3:03 PM
...for writing an entire article and not once using the corrupt construction The Puget Sound! Puget Sound does not take a definite article; never has, never will. Too bad the announcers at the top-rated KUOW (and especially sister station KXOT) never took any English classes at that University they work for.
RE: Thank you...
Report a violationPosted by: Chuck Taylor on May 12, 2008 11:53 PM
Crosscut WriterThis is one of my pet peeves, too. I also hate "the UW."
protecting our assets
Report a violationPosted by: patricia stambor on May 13, 2008 8:49 AM
Knute -

This is one of the best articles on the health of Puget Sound (how you write so well on so many subjects baffles me). People don't realize that the chemicals they put in their mouths don't necessarily get filtered out in sewage treatment.

Today the Seattle Times has a fantastic companion article in their series "Failing our Sound - Beaches Suffer as Walls go Up." We pay lip service to water and shoreline protection but that's about it.
Advertisement
Advertisement

Sign up for Crosscut's free weekday newsletter e-mail.
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Crosscut »
Crosscut Seattle is an online newspaper for the Pacific Northwest, including Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and British Columbia. It's a guide to local and regional news, a place to report and discuss news, and a platform for new tools to convey news.

• More about Crosscut

Contact Crosscut

Tools

Sign up for Crosscut's daily newsletter
About Crosscut
Advertising Info
Crosscut's list of RSS feeds.
Advertisement