A state 'awash in money' from an extraction economy: It's different being governor of Alaska
There's been some progress in getting the homeless out of greenbelts and into shelters
Boeing »Boeing Machinists reject a contract and vote to strike, but a walkout is on hold
Health / Medicine »Robert Jamieson: The unquiet minds among us need treatment and care
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
The mayor's block party weekend
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
(40 comments)
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
(27 comments)
The mayor's block party weekend
(20 comments)
The high price of Sarah Palin's candidacy
(19 comments)
The case for Sarah Palin
(16 comments)
Extreme Seattle
(10 comments)
A classic evisceration speech by the running mate
(10 comments)
Why Palin, why now
(9 comments)
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
(8 comments)
The making of an effective arts board
(6 comments)
But no one seems to be addressing the real transportation problem around here, which is the culture of transportation. People, it's a ground war out there.
Cyclists hate drivers. Drivers hate bikers. Pedestrians are getting squashed. Jaywalkers proliferate. And many drivers are simply insane.
There are a number of factors at play. Gas is more than $3 a gallon, so drivers leave the pump pissed. Commutes are lengthening and shortcuts are disappearing. Cyclists are more numerous and often more aggressive — messengers and swarming cycling clubs were not encountered in the past. Pedestrians are breaking the rules: Once, Seattleites waited their turn on the curb for the light to change; today, many feel free to saunter in front of your car without looking. Some even seem intent on throwing themselves under your wheels.
Believe it or not, what we have in Seattle is a lack of consensus. This time it's about how to treat each other as we move around.
It gets worse. Transportation is not only expensive and problematic, it is now morally charged.
Pedestrians don't just walk to work. They are foot soldiers in the war against obesity and suburbia.
Cyclists don't just whiz on by, they are the Chosen People to save us from Global Warming and Planetary Annihilation.
Auto drivers think they own the roads and are often righteous about their wheels. Cars are mobile mirrors on which we project our sense of power and identity, not to mention a kind of plumage that sends signals in breeding season.
A bike isn't a bike, a crosswalk isn't a crosswalk, a car isn't a car. We're zipping around town in political statements. Movement itself has become protest, but much less fun than in 1999 at WTO.
On top of it all, we have a clash of cultures.
In olden times, Seattleites didn't jaywalk and drove with a passive-aggressive politeness and a kind of cluelessness that was sometimes charming, often annoying, but rarely posed a danger. During my long years of commuting on the 520 bridge, I once saw two drivers, headed in opposite directions, stop and chat with each other while traffic backed up behind them. It was a Mayberry moment.
But stress, crowding, and lots of new drivers from California and back East have changed the mix. Maybe it's also generational. Now you get a Darwinian selfishness on the road that is undoubtedly exacerbated by the Grand Theft Auto generation.
You certainly see that among many cyclists, whose drive for fitness causes them to push themselves to the limit, and whose lust for speed lets them break all rules. Walking around Seward Park, many bikers are too busy pumping away to give you any "on your left" warnings as they come up behind you. I fear they'll snag one of my kidneys as they go by, like a train hooking a mail sack.
So it's aggressive meets clueless. It's righteous meets desperate. Those are fatal combinations.
You can learn to survive and do well in a hyper-aggressive driving culture, like New York or California; and you can live with clueless if you've got time and patience. I once knew a man from Eastern Washington who slowed down for every green light to be sure he would never run a red one. Driving across town was a slooow process, but heck, no one was in a hurry.
But mix them together and you have anarchy.
Some of that shows up in selfish dog-eat-dogism. But it also generates fear, which in turn produces tentativeness and an ill-placed "please don't hurt me" kind of courtesy that makes things worse.
One manifestation is what my wife calls "aggressive politeness." That's the gal with the right of way who waves you to turn in front of her. Or the driver who is too nice — or scared — to pass a cyclist. Or the pedestrian who stops in the middle of the street to let your car by. Ever get stuck at a four-way stop where everyone is trying to let the other guy go first? It often resolves itself when everyone finally lurches into the intersection at once. It's as if the very idea of "right of way" is too classist for Seattle sensibilities.
There are two ways out, as I see it. And these big transportation projects offer an opportunity.
One is a kind of metro-wide driving summit to reach agreement on what our transportation culture will be.
No, I'm not talking about a meeting of electeds and policy wonks. If we could get drivers, bikers, and pedestrians into one room — maybe they could arrive by bus to avoid a riot — we could work out some important cultural details.
A question might be: Do we jaywalk or not? Jaywalking can work if everyone agrees on the rules. In New York, jaywalkers are smart. Here, many are stupid — they wouldn't last a day in Manhattan before being flattened. So is dense, urban Seattle a jaywalking city, and if so, will someone please teach us how? Or do we try and hold the tide against jaywalking, to stick to the old standard that gained us our reputation of niceness? Let's reach agreement.
The summit would work out stuff that isn't in the manuals. For example, what's our attitude toward the police? In some driving cultures, Italy for example, drivers warn each other about speed traps and roadblocks. Such understandings build a sense of libertarian community, if that isn't a contradiction. In other driving cultures, motorists are eager tattletales, squealing on scofflaws at every opportunity. Which are we?
Second, I think it would be wise policy to shave off a few hundred million dollars in transportation spending for bike trails, crosswalks, and freeways, and send everyone to a remedial class on rules of the road. I don't remember everything from driver's ed in 1970. I know I am not alone.
But that refresher class shouldn't just be about driving. It should cover the whole gamut of transportation modes. How do you cross a street and survive? How many cyclists can ride abreast on Lake Washington Boulevard? Is a Segway a pedestrian, car, or bike? Why do so many skateboarders look so old? Why is it that boomers keep killing themselves on Harleys? Or, like a question posed by Borat, how fast do you have to go to kill a (fill in the blank)?
We need answers, and we shouldn't spend a dime more on transportation until we get them.
Maybe I missed the word "optional" next to signalling in driver's ed. Also, I should have mentioned that aggressive politeness often seems downright hostile. If you don't take up someone's offer to violate the right-of-way rules, they wave at you wildly and angrily until you do. They can't seem to imagine that you might see a hazard in doing so that they're not aware of (like another oncoming car). They take your reluctance to accept charity as arrogant definance of their good will. The point is, if we always make it up as we go along, we won't go along very well.
goody: for the record, I miss Rewind too. Though Bill Radke's new show--Weekend America--is a kind of stealth reunion of sorts for some of the old Rewind crew: John Moe is on staff and in recent weeks I've run into Cathy Sorbo and Sherman Alexie at the KUOW studios taping segments for the show.
In the Bay Area, here's a growing phenomenon: Slow down at stop sign or light, look both ways, then drive on through. Why not? You're a busy person, you're more important than a pedestrian or cyclist, and let's face it, laws are for criminals...
No, I am talking about people who cross mid-block into traffic or at corners against red lights. I've seen it regularly downtown, on Capitol Hill and in the Central District. The bus stop at 1st and University is a good spot to watch bad jaywalking, near Harbor Steps. Sometimes it's street people who seem to be making a statement--maybe reclaiming some power by stopping a big hunk of metal. Sometimes its young people doing the same thing. Sometimes, it's just a random idiot who is wandering out there with some kind of blind faith that he or she can walk through cars like Casper the Friendly Roadkill.
Let's see a show of hands. How many of you have seen:
I think you make a great point. It used to be when you drove a car you were essentially outdoors: the car was noisy, you wore a coat, maybe the heater didn't work, or you went without air conditioning (who in the Northwest wanted to pay extra for that?) and rolled the windows down. Now people drive hermetically sealed home entertainment centers: cell phones, computer navigation systems, CD players, even TVs. Give these cars big enough bumpers and it doesn't really matter what's happening outside!
And I know traffic circles are supposed to "calm" traffic, but in some intersections they seem to add to the chaos: plantings block visibility, people take short cuts around them. There was one installed in Kirkland that was slightly too big the intersection, so drivers were forced to steer into a crosswalk to get around it. I predict the day we need to evacuate Seattle (earthquake, eruption, tsunami, avian flu) we will rue the day we clogged our arteries with these things.
Report a violationPosted by: Charles on Apr 11, 2007 9:53 AM