The man who authored the infamous Willie Horton ad has written Obama Unmasked
Boeing »The new request for refueling tanker proposals puts Boeing at a disadvantage
Culture / Ethnicity »A look ahead by the man who modernized UW's library science program
Religion / Faith »Idaho Christian activists protest at Tiananmen Square, are detained, and plan to return
Military »As a national military housing program languishes, a Washington whistleblower waits
In Seattle, let the people 'chill'
Is Big Nanny running your town?
Walkability is nice, but it's not making us skinny
Vision 2040 for Pugetopolis
(32 comments)
The pet peeve
(21 comments)
In Seattle, let the people 'chill'
(16 comments)
Seattle's money madness
(16 comments)
All the rage
(13 comments)
Our balls on ice
(12 comments)
Is Big Nanny running your town?
(10 comments)
A bicoastal newspaper crisis
(10 comments)
Time for a bus-fare reality check
(9 comments)
Walkability is nice, but it's not making us skinny
(8 comments)
Red alert to Dick's Drive-In. They're coming for you next.
The Seattle Times reports that the Fun Forest, which isn't a forest or the right sort of fun, seemingly, is headed to a likely closure, doomed by pressures to erase the tacky from our Seattle Center.
The center used to be a place for everybody. That included the mugwumps who like their hydros loud, the Blue Angels louder, and their Dick's Deluxe with fries.
The Times says the Fun Forest shows declining revenue and it's all very sad, but the city just can't subsidize a marginal business, unless, ahem, its employees are seven feet tall and skillful with a basketball.
OK, the operator owes the city $763,890 in back rent, and business is business, when it's only about that. But it isn't. Nearly every other piece of Seattle Center has a constituency, and nobody gets a no in city politics. The skateboarders get attention and, you bet, a replacement for their lost park. The opera people get their hall and needed subsidies. The Irish get their freckle contest, along with the city's other ethnic groups. Even Channel 9, which has nothing to do with recreation, got a piece on that contested ground. And that's how it should be, our center, our gathering place. Come one, come all.
But I like roller coasters and kiddie rides. It's been a while, but I loved it, especially with kids in tow.
Months ago, when news first broke that the Fun Forest was threatened, I called their operator's offices and they wouldn't talk. That's typical. They had no idea how to play the game, much less make the case that they served a community that deserved a spot, at least somewhere.
So out they go by the end of 2009, that silly collection of metal and grease, squealing kids and other unauthorized noise, yet another discarded remnant of blue collar Seattle.
Is there a roller coaster left in this town?
because they love the Fun Forest, at least the part that caters to the younger set. I have many fond memories riding the boat swing, mini-roller coaster, ferris wheel, dragon and elephant ride, and tornado with my kids clinging to me and screaming with a mix of delight and terror. Or waving to me with a goofy smile from those little cars each time they rounded the loop.
Sean makes an excellent point here. I've watch the Fun Forest for decades, and I never noticed a promotion (they could have used help from the coffee shop guy who launched the SLUT tee-shirts). And true, the pricing structured had problems. The Times reported that the operators invested $9 million in improvements in 1996--that shocked me. So why not do some marketing?
Report a violationPosted by: Sean on Nov 21, 2007 9:38 PM