Gregoire, 49 percent; Rossi, 45
Fearing Muslim outrage, a publisher kills a Washington author's book
2008 Election »We thought we knew where McCain and Obama stood on abortion, but ...
Transportation »San Francisco's bicycle master plan is stymied by a carless activist
Seattle's top political blogs: Don't call them rivals
The campaign for Sound Transit will be 'going Facebook'
After a late start, MSM blogs are everywhere
Eat and walk your way through Northwest cities
Seattle Public Schools flunks civics
Blue, red, right, left: A blogroll for Northwest political junkies
The future of 'nowhere'
(27 comments)
The campaign for Sound Transit will be 'going Facebook'
(16 comments)
Enough with the SLUT jokes
(16 comments)
Seattle's top political blogs: Don't call them rivals
(14 comments)
Seattle Public Schools flunks civics
(10 comments)
Death by a thousand (paper) cuts
(7 comments)
Bellevue's 'Little Eichmann'
(6 comments)
Eat and walk your way through Northwest cities
(6 comments)
A newsstand's last stand
(5 comments)
Terry Theise has no axe to grind about Washington wine
(5 comments)
This is a government-run program that would pay workers to take up to five weeks off work to care for a new child or seriously ill family member. It would be funded by a two-cents-per-hour-worked payroll tax. The Washington Senate passed the legislation back in March. I had a story on public radio yesterday about how the program would work and the politics behind it.
Conway, chair of the House Commerce and Labor Committee, says behind-the-scenes negotiations continue, and here's what's likely to happen: The bill will be modified to only cover parents who take time off to care for a child. If you've got a spouse with cancer or if your elderly parent is dying, you're out of luck. Also, it sounds like the payroll tax funding mechanism is out the door. Conway says what will likely happen is a task force will be appointed to "explore how we would pay for and administer this benefit." Lawmakers have some time to study this issue because the benefit wouldn't kick-in until 2009.
Here's the backstory on why the House might punt on the funding question: Gov. Chris Gregoire said any tax-hike would have to go to a vote of the people. Backers of paid family leave fear a public vote would become a national referendum on the issue. That's something they want to avoid. Currently, only California has this type of insurance, but the idea is gaining traction in legislatures around the country.
Other changes to the legislation are also in the works — mostly designed to calm the fears and anger of the business community. These are largely technical issues.
I would add that minority Republican leaders earlier this session were asked to name the worst bills of the year. Paid family leave was in the top 2 along with "medically accurate" sex-education.