'Landslide Chris': In another tight race, Gov. Gregoire touts her Barack Obama connection
2008 Election »A Montana cattle rancher gives Democratic conventioneers the red meat they crave
Religion / Faith »The daring of non-believers: An 'Imagine No Religion' billboard provokes thought
Workplace / Labor »Boeing Machinists say the company's sweetened offer 'falls well below expectations'
Crosscut's 2008 election predictions, UPDATED
Death by a thousand (paper) cuts
Lake Union Park: a first assessment
The funny thing about Seattle ...
The future of 'nowhere'
(27 comments)
The mayor's block party weekend
(20 comments)
Crosscut's 2008 election predictions, UPDATED
(13 comments)
Death by a thousand (paper) cuts
(8 comments)
The post-partisan electorate
(8 comments)
Lake Union Park: a first assessment
(8 comments)
Extreme Seattle
(7 comments)
Election reflections
(6 comments)
The funny thing about Seattle ...
(6 comments)
A cure for congestion that's simple and cheap (and doomed)
(5 comments)
The folks at Sound Transit really want you to take an online survey to help them do what voters said shouldn't be done via Proposition 1. To get you into proper survey-taking mood, the entry to the survey page states: "Studies show that by 2030, rush 'hour' could last all day in many places." A startling statistic, no doubt, but one begging several questions: What studies? Which places? How are they defining 'rush hour,' and what does that mean, really, that it would last all day? A few links to more information would go a long way here.
But don't judge them too harshly. This portion of the Sound Transit Web site — devoted to system expansion — is new. Hopefully, improvements are forthcoming.
There's a little bit of passive-agressive, subtle Northwest attitude in the survey prompt, as well. For example:
In November 2007, voters turned down a large package of road and transit investments. Now, the Sound Transit Board of Directors is taking a renewed look at what transit service expansions would make the biggest and quickest improvements for commuters for the least cost.
Here's my straight-talking, Midwestern translation: You voters killed our last, best hope for a solution, so now you're going to have to tell us what you want. Since the pundits surmise that you torpedoed Prop 1 due to cost, we'll try to give you the moon for as little cash as humanly possible.
Snarky comments aside, you should take the survey. If only to help them "develop good answers to vital questions." Translation: Your ideas could prevent a day-long rush hour in 2030.
The setup for the Sound Transit survey questionnaire doesn't discuss the qualifications of respondents, which raises questions about Sound Transit's methodology and intent.
Report a violationPosted by: sjenner on Feb 25, 2008 10:16 AM