About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
2008 Election » Alaska »A state 'awash in money' from an extraction economy: It's different being governor of Alaska
Wasilla, Alaska, got $26.9 million in earmarks while Sarah Palin was mayor
Sarah Palin vs. the librarian: Facts are hard to come by
2008 Election »Mayor Palin had a rough record at Wasilla City Hall
Alaska »Under Mayor Palin, Wasilla went the strip-mall route
2008 Election »Sarah Palin's 17-year-old daughter is pregnant and will marry the father
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
Sarah Palin: the liberal voter's worst nightmare
The high price of Sarah Palin's candidacy
About Sarah Palin: an e-mail from Wasilla
(136 comments)
Sarah Palin: the liberal voter's worst nightmare
(34 comments)
Is Sound Transit really one of 'the world's biggest boondoggles'?
(27 comments)
The high price of Sarah Palin's candidacy
(19 comments)
The case for Sarah Palin
(18 comments)
A classic evisceration speech by the running mate
(11 comments)
Why Palin, why now
(9 comments)
An Alaska-sized gamble — and possibly a brilliant one
(8 comments)
No post-convention bounce for the Democrats
(7 comments)
The making of an effective arts board
(6 comments)
There are too many bicycles. They're like anthrax invading the bloodstream, forcing the Ford and Toyota white corpuscles to cling to artery walls, desperately in need of a bypass. I don't actually know if anthrax invades the bloodstream like that, but you get my four-wheel drift. Something nasty invades the bloodstream and clogs things up, just like nasty bicyclists invade the streets we gas buyers have paid for with our taxes, making it impossible for us to get anywhere on time, which has a negative effect on the economy and results in lost jobs, etc.
Compounding the problem is an unfortunate attitude flip-flop that has developed among bicyclists. In the good old days, a bicyclist knew that if he or she dared get on a road otherwise occupied by cars, he or she was at God's mercy, putting his or her life in His or Her hands. Hit one of these transgressing pedalers and that's the breaks, bicycle boy — government's on my side, as long as I didn't have to jump the curb to get you. And even then, I'm OK if I catch a judge who drives a Buick.
This hierarchical tradition still exists in Seattle re pedestrians. Although the shank's mare crowd is bolder now and rapid jaywalking has become endemic (except in the streets immediately adjacent to the Rainier Club), we motorists can still amuse ourselves by seeing how close to walkers' heels we can come, without much fear of constabulary attention. (It's the sole interest we share with bicyclists, actually.) But the two-wheelists no longer consider themselves such fair game. Ironically, as they have become more numerous they have acted more like endangered species, to be coddled at the expense of others. You'd think every Spandex-wearing, stallion-thighed, goateed git on a bike was a sperm whale being chased by the Japanese.
And here's an even more frightening development. Last week, I observed a bicyclist running a stop sign in Wallingford. Nothing outré about that, it happens a hundred times a day just at that particular bottom-of-a-hill sign. But this bicyclist was talking on her cell phone as she did it, barley glancing over to sneer at us drivers with the right-of-way. When motor vehicle cell-phone use is having such a disastrous effect on America that governments pedal. Can two-wheel text messaging be far behind? Can chaos be far behind that? And with the way federal, state, and local governments kowtow to the bikers, innocently smacking your car into a bicyclist with a cell phone will soon lead not only to a felony conviction, but a fine from the Federal Communications Commission.
Writing recently on Crosscut, a Mr. K. "S" Berger suggested that the problem here is not just you-know-who. "The real transportation problem," wrote Mr. Berger, "is the culture of transportation." (Emphasis his.) He contended that part of this cultural problem is that drivers hate bikers. Well, I'm a driver, and I don't hate the arrogant bastards (emphasis mine), even if there's ample evidence that they hate me. I just want a level asphalt playing field. Bicyclists, for instance, seem to be invisible to the Seattle Police Department. What other assumption can you make when dozens of times a day a biker will break a traffic law as a cop watches, and watches, and watches, until the officer finally wanders off to check the parking meters around the hospitals?
And where are these people allowed to ride their bikes, everywhere? On the sidewalk, through crosswalks, in car pool lanes, on planting strips, through the sewers — is there anywhere they can't go? (Not that there's anybody to stop them if they did go some place forbidden, but just supposing.) About the only places you can drive now and escape the bikers are Interstates 5, 90, and 405. How long do you think that's going to last, when the bikers realize the freeways are there, ripe for the clogging?
Mr. Berger thinks the solution to the transportation problem — the alleged cultural problem — is to have a meeting. (Can anybody be that Seattle?) And he wants to use "a few hundred million dollars in transportation spending" to send everyone to a remedial class on rules of the road, like a driver's ed refresher course, only with an expanded curriculum to include the fact that there are a lot of bike riders on the road now who think they own it.
This will not work, for the same reason meetings and classes never work. It's too easy not to show up. (Or I'd have an advanced degree.) However, the following plan will work, and not require me or anybody else to attend anything:
Now this is funny! And true!
Per Dictionary.com...take your pick:
Amen again!
Thanks, thanks a lot. So if bicyclists complain about your article we just don't get the joke. Meantime, all the drivers who'd like to just run all the bikes off the road get encouragement from your wonderfully funny article.
The secret to success when someone pokes fun at you is to join in the joke and poke a little bit at yourself too. Recognize your own foibles and how you do, in fact, appear weird from time to tome to those of us out here in normal land.
Corduroy to Indian musicians? Gandhi would be PO'd! And he'd categorize your cold weather rationale as bupkis! After all, he went to England in the early 1930's where the weather is almost as sublime as ours, and he still wore his dhoti supplemented only by a homespun wrap. All in the spirit of Satyagraha.
Sorry...revenge wa already taken...the polyester leisure suit...
Why, I had red shoes, too! Bought them in London in 1970. They were burgundy, actually. Patent leather burgundy tassel loafers. Wore them with a chocolate brown sweater suit of a skinny-rib turtle neck and bell-bottom sweater pants. Atop this was a brown leather trench coat also purchased in London.
Geoff,
S'cuse me! In a former life I was Franklin W. Dixon! And Jonathan Swift who wrote that stuff about Irish kids? Isn't that where the Swift Meat Packing Co. came from?
Greg, when you try to write humor and people don't find it amusing, it isn't necessarily THEIR fault. I'm glad you and Piper thought your piece was hilarious.
I appreciate that some of you don't find Greg's diatribe funny, but I also think he is representing a sentiment shared by many motorists: Sometimes no amount of careful driving can avoid problems. This sentiment is something that I wish could penetrate the helmets of hard-core cyclists who seem to think they are owed special treatment.
Chuck,
Memo to Sean: The ol' Piper has an advanced degree.
Swift's motto? "Have a friend for lunch..."
That's because after the Big Dig Mini-Me fiasco, most folks in town think the mayor is a giant posterior...Respectfully, of course...
Heavens to Murgatroid! Must everything end up being about Iraq??? What is this? Fixation city???
I suppose that it is to be expected, especially in good liberal King County, that if you want to slam somebody, you couple them in some way, no matter how far fetched, with Ronald Reagan and George Bush. And if doing it requires ignoring the obvious facetious nature of what they said, well, maybe your Spandex'd friends won't notice. It's especially intriguing coming from someone who embraces Bush-logic so thoroughly that he contends a bicyclist running a stop sign proves that cars cause traffic congestion because if a car runs a stop sign it's a much bigger problem. Or am I missing something in the argument there, Bob?
There must be something in the water. How else to explain it? How else to understand the puritanical streak that runs the what's arguably the blueist town in America. A guy can't have a little fun in this berg by holding up tongue firmly in cheek some quite obvious things about the holy of holy (to it's adherents, anyway) bicycle culture and poking a lettle gentle-natured fun at it without him getting hauled before some local Tomas de Torquemada wannabes. Gives new meaning to the term bicycle "rack."
Thank you for serving as an excellent illustration of the points I made in my post immediately preceding yours.
Wally...
Speaking as a gun owner...laugh away!
Report a violationPosted by: Piper Scott on May 2, 2007 6:33 AM